Vikas Divyakirti Critiques Animal: ‘An Excessively Crude and Disrespectful Film.

Vikas Divyakirti, renowned educator, YouTube personality, and former IAS officer, has raised eyebrows with his scathing critique of Sandeep Reddy Vanga’s film “Animal,” starring Ranbir Kapoor. In a candid interview with radio host Neelesh Misra, Vikas did not mince words, labeling the film as “vulgar” and expressing concerns about its potential negative influence on impressionable young minds.

According to Vikas, “Animal” represents a regressive step for society, setting it back by a decade. He questioned the moral and societal implications of glorifying a character who exhibits animalistic behavior without any redeeming social value. Vikas criticized a particular scene in which Ranbir Kapoor’s character demands a woman, played by Tripti Dimri, to lick his shoe as a test of loyalty. He expressed apprehension about the impact such scenes could have on individuals with feudal mindsets, potentially normalizing disrespectful and demeaning behavior in relationships.

Vikas’s blunt assessment reflects his deep concern about the societal messages conveyed through popular media and entertainment. As someone deeply invested in education and social upliftment, Vikas advocates for responsible storytelling that fosters positive values and ethical behavior.

Notably, Vikas is recognized for his cameo appearance as himself in Vidhu Vinod Chopra’s “12th Fail,” a film starring Vikrant Massey. Running an IAS coaching institute and producing viral YouTube content, Vikas is known for his commitment to empowering and inspiring others through education and mentorship.

While “Animal” achieved blockbuster success, grossing ₹900 crore worldwide and becoming Ranbir Kapoor’s highest-grossing film to date, it also faced criticism for its portrayal of toxic masculinity, infidelity, and violent conduct. Despite its commercial success, the film’s controversial themes sparked debate within the film industry and among audiences.

In response to the film’s reception, various celebrities, including Vidya Balan, have offered their perspectives. Vidya emphasized the importance of conviction in storytelling, noting that while “Animal” may have had compelling content, its unapologetic approach to narrative storytelling contributed to its impact. She praised the film’s unabashed portrayal of its subject matter, suggesting that its bold storytelling approach resonated with audiences.

The controversy surrounding “Animal” underscores the complex interplay between artistic expression, societal values, and audience reception in contemporary cinema. As filmmakers navigate the terrain of storytelling, they grapple with the responsibility of addressing sensitive themes while engaging and entertaining audiences.

Ultimately, Vikas Divyakirti’s critique of “Animal” serves as a reminder of the power of cinema to shape perceptions and influence social norms. As discussions surrounding the film continue, it prompts reflection on the ethical and moral responsibilities of storytellers in an increasingly interconnected and diverse society.

Beyond the realm of entertainment, Vikas Divyakirti’s commentary highlights broader societal concerns regarding the impact of media representation on cultural attitudes and behavior. As a respected figure in education and public discourse, Vikas’s critique invites deeper reflection on the role of popular culture in shaping societal norms and values.

The debate surrounding “Animal” extends beyond mere cinematic analysis to encompass larger questions about the portrayal of gender dynamics, power dynamics, and ethical conduct in media. While entertainment serves as a form of escapism and artistic expression, it also wields significant influence in shaping perceptions and attitudes, particularly among impressionable audiences.

In the age of digital media and widespread accessibility, the responsibility of content creators, filmmakers, and artists to uphold ethical standards and promote positive messaging becomes increasingly vital. As guardians of public discourse, they possess the power to either reinforce harmful stereotypes and behaviors or promote inclusivity, empathy, and social awareness.

The controversy surrounding “Animal” underscores the importance of critical media literacy and conscientious consumption. It prompts audiences to interrogate the underlying messages conveyed by popular media and to discern between entertainment and endorsement. By fostering a culture of media literacy, individuals can develop the tools necessary to engage with media content critically and responsibly.

For the latest updates-click here.