Kejriwal’s Reluctant Concession: Agrees to Face ED via Video Conferencing Post March 12
Kejriwal’s Reluctant Concession: Agrees to Virtual ED Appearance Amidst Growing Pressure
Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal, entangled in the midst of a legal quagmire, once again evaded the Enforcement Directorate’s (ED) summons on Monday, marking the eighth instance since November 2. The summons pertained to an ongoing investigation into alleged irregularities surrounding the now-defunct 2021-22 Delhi excise policy. However, in a gesture seemingly borne out of reluctance, Kejriwal extended an olive branch to the federal agency, expressing his willingness to engage in questioning via video conferencing post-March 12.
Kejriwal’s Reluctant ConcessionDespite his absence, a representative from the Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) communicated his stance, asserting his readiness to cooperate with the ED’s inquiries remotely. Citing the purported illegality of the summons and alluding to political machinations, the AAP underscored its belief that the ultimate decision regarding Kejriwal’s appearance rests with the Delhi court. The party insinuated that the summons were politically motivated, attributing them to alleged pressure exerted by the ruling Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP)-led Union government.
Kejriwal’s defiance of the ED’s summons dates back to November 2, a stance he has maintained by dismissing them as baseless and politically charged. His recent declaration, stipulating his appearance contingent upon a court order, underscores the escalating tension surrounding the investigation. Notably, the ED had petitioned the Rouse Avenue court in Delhi on February 3, seeking legal recourse against Kejriwal for repeated non-compliance with their summons. Subsequently, the court granted Kejriwal an exemption from physical attendance until March 16, citing his virtual participation in light of the ongoing Budget session of the Delhi assembly.
In response to his latest maneuver, BJP leader Harish Khurana expressed skepticism, questioning the chief minister’s motives and casting aspersions on his commitment to transparency. Khurana’s criticism centered on Kejriwal’s readiness to engage with the ED via video conferencing while evading physical appearance. He characterized Kejriwal’s actions as an attempt to evade scrutiny, insinuating complicity in the alleged irregularities under investigation.
The ongoing saga surrounding his legal entanglements underscores the intersection of politics and law enforcement, with each party seeking to assert its narrative and influence the course of events. Kejriwal’s reluctance to comply with the ED’s summons, juxtaposed with his willingness to engage virtually, reflects the delicate balance between legal obligations and political maneuvering.
As the investigation unfolds, the spotlight remains firmly trained on Kejriwal and the AAP, with each development carrying significant implications for both the political landscape of Delhi and the broader national discourse. Whether his overture towards virtual cooperation will assuage concerns or further stoke the flames of controversy remains to be seen. In the meantime, the wheels of justice continue to turn, casting a shadow of uncertainty over the future trajectory of this high-profile case.
Arvind Kejriwal, the Chief Minister of Delhi, continues to evade summons from the Enforcement Directorate (ED) regarding alleged irregularities in the now-defunct 2021-22 Delhi excise policy case. Despite repeated calls to appear before the federal agency, Kejriwal has remained absent since November 2. However, in a recent development, he has expressed his willingness to cooperate with the ED through video conferencing, albeit after March 12.
The decision comes amidst a flurry of legal maneuvers and political tensions surrounding the case. his Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) has been vocal in its defense, arguing that the legality of the summons should be determined by a Delhi court. They contend that the pressure exerted by the ruling Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) government at the center, particularly amidst AAP’s association with the Opposition Indian National Developmental Inclusive Alliance (INDIA), has influenced the proceedings.
Kejriwal’s stance has remained steadfast, with assertions that the ED summons are not only illegal but also politically motivated. Despite this, he had previously indicated his willingness to comply with the ED’s requests if compelled by a court order. The ED, in response to his repeated absences, had approached the Rouse Avenue court in Delhi, seeking action against him for non-compliance.
For the latest updates-click here.
